What happened to the enola gay
More active participation is, of course, welcome and desirable. But before we launch a public campaign and officially contact the Smithsonian, we seek endorsements of the statement from a small number of prominent individuals who can help the effort gain credibility and attract media attention. We, in fact, welcome and intend to initiate a national discussion of both the 1945 bombings and of current nuclear issues. The statement makes clear that we are not opposed to exhibiting the plane in a fair and responsible manner, but that we fear that such a celebratory exhibit both legitimizes what happened in 1945 and helps build support for the Bush administration’s dangerous new nuclear policies. We have formulated the following statement of principles, which we plan to circulate widely. Professor of history and director of the Nuclear Studies Institute, American University writes in the landing page of the website, “Dear Friend, A committee of scholars, veterans, clergy, activists, students, and other interested individuals is now forming to challenge the Smithsonian’s plans to exhibit the Enola Gay solely as a “magnificent technological achievement.” The planned exhibit is devoid not only of historical context and discussion of the ongoing controversy surrounding the bombings but even of basic information regarding the number of casualties. The website has an introduction letter which can significantly explain the reason behind why the website was made. The committee also provided the address where the completed petitions shall be sent which is at: There is also information about the committee’s petition which is circulating worldwide and the website provides a link where it can be printed and it will be delivered to the White House before the opening of the exhibit. On the landing page of the website, you can see the list of contents found on the whole site.
Nuclear history and the current policies around it. The website was created to make a committee for a national discussion of